Kepler astrology progression chart
However, instead of the associates of Al Capone or The Kray twins, I was looking at Frank Sinatra and all his wives and girlfriends, and all their partners and their partner’s partners. It was difficult for me to unconsciously select only positive examples because I was primarily concerned with people in multiple relationships. This method enabled me to gather a great deal of accurate data from public sources in a controlled process. In this experiment I tracked down 1,300 intimate relationships of people in the public eye, tracking each as if I were tracing organised crime networks applying a technique known as Criminal Groups Analysis. Two years ago, I carried out a repeat of an experiment that I first conducted in 2005. Now that we have some repeated outcomes the question becomes how does this change the landscape? But this is because there was extraordinarily little astrological research done. Until recently, there were very few replications in astrological research. We will also gain more valuable insights into the subject.īy contrast, if we make a claim that cannot be falsified (which is a key quality of any pseudoscience) we can neither prove nor disprove the claim. The more certainty we have, the more useful the research is and the more accurate our future predictions will be. If research results can be replicated, it means the results are more likely to be correct, and future predictions can be made using the research. That’s when vaccination was discovered, a development followed by breakthroughs leading to anaesthesia, antiseptics, germ theory and antibiotics. It took 130 more years before general medicine started to look like a real science. Medicine made it into the French Academy of Sciences on the back of surgery, but astrology, separated from astronomy, did not. So, while surgery was quite advanced in the 1660s, general medicine was largely based on ancient texts, untested beliefs, and doubtful practices. The same surgeon is recorded eight year later ‘bleeding’ his patient.
In 1658, the diarist Samuel Pepys reported being operated upon by a surgeon who removed a bladder stone ‘the size of a tennis ball’. Note that back in the 17 th Century medicine was in a similar state to astrology, but surgery was in a far better place. Only a tiny number of funded researchers have experimented with astrology. In contrast, there has been comparatively close to ZERO hours of scientific research into astrology.
And, since then, all these subjects have changed beyond recognition. There have been multi-billions of hours of research into all the sciences that made it into the French Academy – Mathematics, Mechanics, Astronomy, Physics, Chemistry, Mineralogy, Botany, Agriculture, Anatomy and Zoology, Medicine and Surgery. Your first question at this point might be: How could it be that a decision taken almost 355 years ago can affect the subject today? The answer, quite simply, is because of the amount of scientific research done since that date. All subsequent judgements about the subject have been made based upon, and affected by, the insights of this date in history. The decision that astrology is a pseudoscience was taken on or around December 22nd, 1666 by Jean Baptiste Colbert when he founded the French Academy of Sciences. We can now say with a high degree of certainty that linking this claim with astrology is wrong. A pseudoscience is something that looks like science but provides no predictive value or genuine insights. While astrology has always looked scientific, (it uses mathematics, psychology, astrometry, and geometry), the scientific establishment has flatly rejected it, claiming that it is a pseudoscience.
#KEPLER ASTROLOGY PROGRESSION CHART HOW TO#
Indeed, since the leading figures of the Western Enlightenment, Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Descartes, and Hume showed us how to understand the difference between what we believe to be true through faith and tradition and what we can know with a high degree of certainty through experimentation, astrology has been outside the tent. These results not only validate astrology they allow us to formulate a theory of astrology that can be tested.įor more than three hundred and fifty years, astrology has been operating outside of the boundaries of science. We have large-scale peer-reviewed experimental outcomes that show repeated results. Astrology no longer operating outside the boundaries of scienceĪstrology used to be viewed as a pseudoscience, but we now have enough scientific evidence to counter this view.